<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is code quality ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about improvement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:58:54 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>For me code quality is made up of a number of criteria and not just one thing.

-&gt;Does the code solve the business problem
-&gt;Elegance of the solution (can the developer explain the design decisions)
-&gt;Is it understandable by someone else
-&gt;Is it unit testable 

and more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me code quality is made up of a number of criteria and not just one thing.</p>
<p>-&gt;Does the code solve the business problem<br />
-&gt;Elegance of the solution (can the developer explain the design decisions)<br />
-&gt;Is it understandable by someone else<br />
-&gt;Is it unit testable </p>
<p>and more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Tonoli</title>
		<link>http://www.refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Tonoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>How about this as a start: Good code is (amongst other things) code that any developer of equal experience, and no previous exposure to the code or business, can understand by simply reading it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this as a start: Good code is (amongst other things) code that any developer of equal experience, and no previous exposure to the code or business, can understand by simply reading it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Willemse</title>
		<link>http://www.refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Willemse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>What about a good understanding of the paradigm ? it&#039;s all to often I have seen typical procedural code in an OO paradigm. Does this not constitue bad code ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a good understanding of the paradigm ? it&#8217;s all to often I have seen typical procedural code in an OO paradigm. Does this not constitue bad code ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Tapson</title>
		<link>http://www.refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Tapson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>This is one of those personal things - what one person thinks of as quality code, another reviles.

Personally I think it&#039;s dependent on the environment - for corporate code I go for simplicity over clever complexity, comments that describe what the code is supposed to do (as opposed to what it does) and a convention that is not too verbose.  With a convention should come uniformity.

In something like a skunkworks, things can be different - one does not need to be quite so pedantic as hopefully experienced and enthusiastic developers will have some sense of responsibility towards the code base / other developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those personal things &#8211; what one person thinks of as quality code, another reviles.</p>
<p>Personally I think it&#8217;s dependent on the environment &#8211; for corporate code I go for simplicity over clever complexity, comments that describe what the code is supposed to do (as opposed to what it does) and a convention that is not too verbose.  With a convention should come uniformity.</p>
<p>In something like a skunkworks, things can be different &#8211; one does not need to be quite so pedantic as hopefully experienced and enthusiastic developers will have some sense of responsibility towards the code base / other developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickus</title>
		<link>http://www.refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://refactor.co.za/2009/09/07/what-is-code-quality/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s easy -

Good code is code that behaves itself :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s easy -</p>
<p>Good code is code that behaves itself <img src='http://www.refactor.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
